日本瓦斯株式会社
株式会社ミロク情報サービス
株式会社H&K
ATHLETA
ゼビオグループ

MATCH

2019 MEIJI YASUDA J2 LEAGUE 25th Sec - Tochigi SC vs Tokyo Verdy

Match Report

After two victories in two matches under their new manager Nagai, Verdy now faced their first away match of the season. Their opponent was Tochigi SC, a team who came back from a two-goal lead to defeat them in the season’s first leg. The encounter was thus an opportunity to gain revenge for a rough home loss.

 

With the J-League season now entering a packed schedule of matches under the harsh summer heat, the Verdy squad saw a lot of turnover in their selections. Lee Yong Jick was suspended for an accumulation of yellow cards and Naoya Tamura was brought in to take his place and mark the opponents’ ace, Oguro. Tatsuya Uchida was chosen to combine with Kota Watanabe at holding midfield, while Naoto Sawai appeared on the right of midfield in his first start since returning to the team, followed by Yuta Narawa on the opposite side in his first start since returning from injury. Finally, Leandro remained at the tip of the spear as lone striker, playing in front of Kanya Fujimoto and Koki Morita.

 

The match opened with Tochigi pressing hard from the front. Though Verdy wanted to move the ball deliberately and build from the back, their opponents were a foot faster and the players could not move the ball forward. On the contrary, a spilled corner kick in the 3rd minute led to a dangerous mid-range shot that came off the post. In the 7th minute, the right side of the Verdy defense was broken down and a cross played in front of goal was met by the head of Oguro. The ball went just wide of the left post but still indicated the continued pressure Verdy faced, leaving everyone nervous. The team finally began to fight back in the 8th minute. Fujimoto broke through the opponent’s defense on the right side and hit a through ball to Leandro. After drawing markers away, Leandro played a shallow return pass that was met first time by Sawai, but his effort failed to find the target. Once the match settled, Verdy’s overwhelming time in possession began to stand out. The opposition, as well, ceased trying to press from the front at all costs and organized themselves at the back to neutralize Verdy’s pass work. The conservative approach was also an effective way to erase space. With each switch of the play from side to side, the opposition would maintain their shape and slide. They also packed the center of the pitch and cut out the midrange passes of Rihito Yamamoto that often initiate the Verdy attack. Verdy responded with a patient approach and continued moving the ball, but they were unable to raise the tempo and found any attempts to break through the middle blocked by a defensive wall. This also allowed the opposition to break forward on the counter and pressure the Verdy goal several times. The first half thus ended with Verdy retaining possession and attempting to wear their opponents down.

 

Looking to open seams in the opposition’s shape, the manager made changes to the system at half time and sent the team out with renewed energy in the second half. For personnel, Uchida was also taken off for Koike and the team lined up with a back four, pushing Yamamoto into midfield.

 

To take up higher positions than the first half and control the game from up the pitch, Verdy would push forward immediately after the break. However, the opposition’s shape and organization remained tight, eliminating space while Verdy attempted to build from the side and break them down. Though Verdy were able to carry the ball higher up the pitch, they still were unable to create shots on goal. Peppering the opposition with crosses was one option in attack, but Verdy chose to stretch the defense with their pass work and try to open pathways to score. In particular, Koike, Sawai, and Fujimoto combined to move the ball in the final third. While Koike was able, at times, to cut inside and pressure the defense, he too was unable to find the finish and saw his efforts cleared. As the match entered the closing stages, the narrative of the game became even more set in stone. Verdy continued to pour forward and in response, Tochigi continued aiming to hit Verdy on the counter with a single killer ball behind the defense. Even as the play grew more open, Verdy stuck to their guns and wove together moves from the center and wide areas. After being brought on for Leandro, Jin Hanato made himself a target man to receive the ball in the box time and again, but he was unable to combine effectively with the second and third rows of the attack and the team were still unable to create shots. In the end, the whistle blew with Verdy in total domination of the play but the score unchanged, forcing the team to settle for a scoreless draw.

 

With most observers expecting Verdy to earn their third consecutive win on this day, due to their opponents’ current struggles at the bottom of the table, Tochigi made their desire for a point clear and defended well. Even having obtained total control of the play, Verdy seemed far from claiming a goal for the full 90 minutes. Tactical understanding is still building among the players as they work with their new manager, but on this day, the opposition’s defensive concentration was a step above. Despite that, there were still moments when the players realized the manager’s vision for building toward a goal. It has now been two weeks since the beginning of the Nagai era and the players will soon begin full efforts to develop a common tactical understanding. In order to break down a tight defense like they played today, strength, flexibility of ideas, and shared vision will be key. The team have only three days until the next match. Though time is limited, they must elevate their quality in any way possible to earn a win against Kyoto, a team who currently stand above them in the table. 

 

Read more

Post-match comments

Manager Hideki Nagai

Your thoughts on the match?
We’ve achieved about half of what we’re trying to do, but this match was a reminder that the remaining half will require greater quality and will to improve. It was an extremely frustrating match. At half time, you told the players to push their opponents back a bit farther. What elements do you think prevented you from doing that today? In terms of when to make runs behind, there is still a gap between the timing I have in mind and the timing of the runs being made by the players on the pitch. It’s something that will require more work and we hope to improve on that from here. Can you tell us why you took off Uchida at half time? We were losing the ball too easily, so I felt we needed a change in plan and personnel.

Read more

Post-match comments

MF 14Naoto Sawai

Your thoughts on the match?
I think we achieved about half of what we set out to do. We were able to push into their territory and move the ball, but we couldn’t do the other half, which was to set up the finish. We have to be more aggressive. Otherwise, we won’t be a threat, no matter how well the ball moves. That’s how it felt. In the first half, both wing backs made diagonal runs behind, but the ball never seemed to come. My job is simply to make runs whenever the ball holder is free, so whether the ball comes every time or not, if I keep moving in that way, I believe it will come eventually. Other than that, there is the matter of communicating with the players making the passes. Either way, those sort of runs will annoy the opposition and I want to continue making them.

In the second half, you moved to the wide striker position. What were you conscious of in that role?
In general, my role was unchanged. My job was to stay wide and far enough forward that their wingbacks couldn’t get up the pitch. At a certain point, Koike started making more of the runs, so when that happened, I tried to make runs into the box and see if I could finish. In the second half, you were more successful at building on the wide right. The stats tell the story. We only had one shot on goal. We were moving the ball, but in the second half too, we did half of what we wanted and couldn’t do the other half.

The shot you made in the first half didn’t get counted in the stats as a shot on goal.
I guess it can’t be helped, since it ended up as a throw-in. Mon (Leandro) had a good look at it and he told me afterward that I could have controlled it instead of hitting it first time. I think he’s right, I did have time. To tell the truth, I wanted that to be counted as a shot.

This was your first appearance since registering with the squad three matches ago. I’m sure you had strong feelings about being on the pitch.
I had learned from Nagai when he was even still a player, so when he became the manager, I wanted to help him realize his brand of football. With as much competition as there is right now, I think the players who receive a chance need to give 100% at all times. So I think the best thing for us, right now, is to keep intensifying that competition and work together to achieve the manager’s philosophy.

This was your first official match since Ajaccio completed their season. How are you feeling, condition-wise, and in terms of sharpness?
I re-joined Verdy as soon as I came home and had two months of preparation. I was able to raise my condition then and have been communicating well with the other players. I had been preparing to be at my best whenever the chance came my way. I didn’t have any anxiety in that regard.

What aspects of your game do you hope to show us in the future?
I want to be more aggressive in challenging for the ball. In terms of today’s match, if this had been Ajaccio, I think we would have created more chances in front of goal and that aggressiveness is what the team is lacking right now. Individually, I want to show my desire to score.

Read more

GK 21Naoto Kamifukumoto

Your thoughts on the match?
Even looking only at the stats, you can tell that we didn’t create enough shots on goal and we all feel that we haven’t yet progressed to the level that we can break down a team that plays with a defensive approach. However, even though we were lacking in terms of creating goals, maintaining possession of the ball means that the other team doesn’t have a chance to attack either, so in terms of dominating the play, I think we did well. Still, there’s a lot of room for improvement in terms of getting goals and if we can get better, I think we’ll be a much more dangerous team.

You kept a clean sheet, despite playing with a somewhat hastily assembled back line.
Everyone’s roles were clear and I think Coach Nagai made the decision to change the line after analyzing our opponents. Tamu(ra) was substituted quickly, but up to that point, he had done a great job of stifling their attacks and encouraging everyone to concentrate. That prevented our opponents from finding any gaps to exploit and I feel it made a big difference in the way we competed. Our goal is to become a team that maintains a high level of quality, no matter which players are on the pitch, and I think it means a lot that we were able to compete against an opponent like we played today with this lineup. If we don’t play as a unit, this league can be very difficult, so I really am glad for that.

It must have been difficult to manage risks as you essentially played a half court drill in the second half.
To be honest, I felt that even when we lost the ball, as long as we maintained good separation, we could quickly win it back. When I’m playing that high up the pitch, I’m sure the opposition has to make the choice to use quick players and aim behind me, rather than trying to control the ball in front of the defense. I did it with the intention of covering, but there are aspects where it went well and others where we needed to raise our precision. That’s something for me to work on, individually, but if we can learn to do it throughout the whole team, we can completely shut out our opponents, so I want us to work on it.

In the past, as well, you have tried to play as an “11th field player”, but is there anything that’s changed for you with the team’s new approach?
The two managers have different styles, but in terms of wanting to dominate possession, they were the same. It’s the team approach that’s different and it’s important that we make the right decisions with that in mind. Coach Nagai places a big emphasis on observing what our opponents are doing and that applies to me, the goalkeeper, as well. I do think that observing the other team is important and we’re trying to get better at it. We have to observe them and spend 90 minutes putting the ball in areas that are difficult for them to deal with. In that aspect, I want us to improve our decision making as a team.

Next week, you have a rematch against Kyoto, the team to whom you conceded the most goals earlier in the season. Considering that both teams like to keep possession, this should be a good test of how far you’ve come under the new manager.
For me, individually, it’s a match that I’m excited for. I’m sure we’ll take turns keeping possession, but in terms of how we develop our play from there, it should be quite fascinating. More than anything, I think we need to prepare for many different scenarios. That means analyzing our opponent. I also think it will be a test of observing our opponents as we play. With the way we play now, each of us has our own strong points and we need to express them to be the better team and get revenge for the last result, even though it’s an away match. Regardless, I want us to play our game and be the better team.

Read more

MF 4Kanya Fujimoto

Did things feel a bit stagnant in attack?
While this wasn’t the case in the first half, against an opponent like today’s, we have to use the full width and length of the pitch. I did have opportunities to make a run behind a few times, but if I can run at them when Junki (Koike) or Naoto (Sawai) have the ball, we can stretch them lengthwise and that will enable us to recycle possession and control the center more. Rather than always try to go through the middle, I think we need to be patient and spread them wider and longer. Then we can attack the middle. That will be most effective.

Were you not able to draw them out as much as you thought?
They were much more poised than we were. On the contrary, it felt like we were lacking in poise. Despite having plenty of time, we tried to force the ball in attacking areas and made mistakes, which set them up for dangerous counter attacks. While it’s an extreme example, there are even teams that pass the ball for 90 minutes and then score in the final minute. I think Coach Nagai would say the same and if we continue passing the ball, I don’t think we will lose. Our opponents will grow tired and start making mistakes in defense. That may sound too logical, but it’s one possible conclusion. I think we should have remained patient and moved the ball.

Was precision at the end of moves or a lack of combination play responsible for your difficulties in attack?
I think those elements were part of it, but more, I think there were too few moments when we took the initiative. I also think we didn’t make enough runs behind. Despite the fact that our ball holders were given space to make passes, we ended up moving the ball to the player behind us in most cases and I think there were many instances where there was enough time to make passes to the players who were making forward runs. Some of it was due to the environment in which we played, but that applies equally to the other side and I think it was probably harder for the them as the team chasing the ball. I wanted us to get behind the defense and set up more opportunities where we were one v one or two v one with the goalkeeper.

Against a team like today, to do what you’re talking about and stretch them lengthwise would surely require a lot of precision and the proper timing.
There were mistakes with precision and combination play, but I think we only had one official shot on goal. If we don’t place shots on goal, they won’t raise their defensive line. It’s true that pinning their line deep is actually one of our objectives, but once that’s accomplished, if we don’t take the opportunity to shoot when the angle is there, it becomes difficult to break them down.

Why do you think you struggled to put shots in?
I think we focused too much on breaking them down. Coach Nagai did tell us to beat them by moving the ball, but what he means is that we have to force them back by moving the ball and then go for the kill once they retreat. As part of that process, he’s told us that we are free to shoot whenever we have the chance and I don’t think we need to pass those opportunities up and continue aiming for a complete defensive collapse. If we are able to completely break them down, we’ll definitely score, but if we lose the ball, we get hit on the counter, so I think once we succeed at pushing them back, we need to shoot, and if they raise their line in response, then we can try playing balls behind. I don’t believe we’ve developed that sort of common understanding, yet.

Since you’ve played under Coach Nagai in the past, do you think the squad is currently trying too hard to do what they’re told? Or is it more that there is some misunderstanding?
I do think we saw a lot of the former, today. Players were afraid to make mistakes or were so wary of turning the ball over that they passed up shots. There were too many instances where we did not take the initiative to make something happen. Of course, no one wants to make mistakes, but if you put yourself in the opponents’ shoes, they don’t want to be dealing with shots flying in from all angles, either. They also don’t want to deal with one-two combinations. We need to think about things from their perspective.

Does that mean that when Coach Nagai tells you to observe your opponents, it includes doing things that will make things difficult for them?
Yes. Up and down the pitch, left and right, where is everyone standing, how are they responding to our moves? With football, you have to watch those things. The fact that we pushed them that deep today and had so few shots is itself evidence that we’re not seeing the game properly, yet.

Read more

MF 23Naoya Tamura

How did you go about dealing with their attack?
In the case of Henik, I left him to Taira, while I marked Oguro. I had to respect his ability as I do so, but in terms of today’s match, I don’t think we allowed him to have a big impact.

In attack, the opposition’s defensive plan seemed to cause you trouble.
Coach Nagai’s philosophy is to keep the ball and make our opponents run. Other than that, it’s about what we can do in the attacking third. Today, we didn’t have many shots, so that’s something we have to work on, but if we’re looking for positives, I think we achieved the first stage of the plan. Now, we need to figure out what we do from there. In some ways, they let us off the hook today and not everything was perfect, but the issues we have were borne from everyone trying to achieve what the manager wants, so I don’t we should be too negative in our outlook. Next week we play Kyoto. I’m excited to see how we approach that match.

As your opponents retreated into their own third, I’m sure you made some changes to how you managed your defensive line.
In some ways, we could have taken more risks from the back, but we also have the option of forcing them to chase before making the pass. To create two v ones in the wide areas, a center back needs to have a bit of technique. So, I do think we could have done more in that sense. I’d like to have a look at the video. Nagai football has a lot of interesting elements and there’s a lot to learn, even for someone my age. Still, to win requires playing exciting football and having your share of the ball, so that part is the same as before. I hope we can increase our achievement level.

The back line today came together in a hurry, but in the end, you earned a clean sheet.
I had never played at the center of a back three before, but Coach Nagai has a number of different plans and likes to find different ways to use Rihito (Yamamoto), so while it was a bit sudden, putting Junki (Koike) at right side back energizes the attack and I want us to work on getting close to the penalty area and figuring out how we break them down from there. There were a few moments of danger that could have led to a loss today, so it was actually a difficult match.

Including the concerns over pitch condition, do you think the scouting report on the opposition was pretty accurate, today?
They dropped back even further than we expected. We expected them to press from the front a bit more and try to win the ball, but they never came at us. There were no problems with the pitch. In some ways, everything was comfortable, but while we were trying to break them down, we didn’t get the ball to Mon (Leandro) enough. I wish we had done that a little better.

Read more

MF 19Junki Koike

What instructions did you receive before coming on in the second half?
We changed the formation and I came on as a right side back. The first to do was gain a high position and after that, work well with Sawai. When he made diagonal runs, the opposition would follow him and that gave me space to run behind the defense. All that remained was for someone to make a late run.

You succeeded in pushing them back into their own third.
We pushed them pretty deep. However, they had a clear plan to be tight and not take risks. We couldn’t break them down.

Halfway through the second half, you did have a clear chance and shot on goal with a late run. Was that more effective?
It’s something we’re always mindful of and I wanted us to at least get something to show for it. I wanted us to create more opportunities like that as we moved the ball. We had possession for an extremely long period today, so rather than lose patience and turn the ball over, our plan was to move the ball from side to side and then take advantage of late runs. However, we just couldn’t create a lot of shots. That’s something we have to work on and if we can break our opponents down better in their own half, I think we will reach the next level as a team.

At the beginning of the second half, you tried putting in some early crosses from the right wing.
We don’t necessarily have tall players in the middle, so we just have to move the ball short. Of course, it’s not that it’s bad to cross, but in training, we worked on keeping the ball moving and using the player closest to you to get behind them. We’re still working on that. Of course, I would have liked to win, but I think we need to stick with this approach.

Looking at the stats, there was a big gap with your opponents in terms of the number of passes made and your percentage of the possession. Is that the style you’re seeking?
Dominating the ball and increasing the amount of time we’re in control is one theme. However, that’s not the same thing as a goal. Rather, it’s the process by which we get a goal. In that sense, we didn’t take near enough shots. The purpose of keeping the ball is to get shots in, so we have to work more on making runs or supporting each other. We did that to a degree, but we have to do it more.

Read more

Share The Match!

SCHEDULE